Jimmy, see my revision of the proposal:

http://deme.stanford.edu/viewing/htmldocument/207

Todd

On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, Jimmy Tobin wrote:

> [Jimmy Tobin][1] commented on [Project Model Proposal][2]
> Comment title: [Re: list of dependencies][3]
>
> * * *
>
> When you say requirement do you mean the current task needs to be finished
> before doing the task in the requirement field?
>
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Mike Mintz <mintz@stanford.edu>; wrote:
>
>> Mike Mintz <http://deme.stanford.edu/viewing/person/7>; commented on Project
>
>> Model Proposal <http://deme.stanford.edu/viewing/htmldocument/207>;
>> Comment title: Re: list of
> dependencies<http://deme.stanford.edu/viewing/textcomment/243>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> You would need a new relationship type called TaskDependency, with two
>> fields: dependent (the thing that is waiting on the other task before
>> it can even get started), and requirement. I'm not attached to these
>> names, but that's the general idea of how to do many-to-many
>> relationships.
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Todd Davies <davies@stanford.edu>; wrote:
>>> Todd Davies commented on Project Model Proposal
>>> Comment title: list of dependencies
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>>
>>> This was Mike's idea, but I know we can't have a list as a filler of a
>>> field. Mike, how did you propose to represent dependencies between tasks?
>
>>
>
>
> [1]: http://deme.stanford.edu/viewing/person/46
> [2]: http://deme.stanford.edu/viewing/htmldocument/207
> [3]: http://deme.stanford.edu/viewing/textcomment/262
>
>